Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Aug 23.
Published in final edited form as: Jacobs J Psychiatry Behav Sci. 2016 Nov 21;2(2):016.

Appendix Table C.

Item Factor Loadings for the Strength and Difficulty Questionnaire

Time 1 Time 2

1-factor model 4-factor model 1-factor model 3-factor model

Emotion Symptom Subscale
Often complains of headaches, stomach-aches or sickness .435 .390 .414 .399
Many worries, often seems worried .451 .561 .519 .590
Often unhappy, down-hearted or tearful .442 .552 .572 .765
Nervous or clingy in new situations, easily loses confidence .481 .510 .295 .267
Many fears, easily scared .342 .393 .312 .443

Conduct Problem Subscale
Often has temper tantrums or hot tempers .325 .368 .526 .449
Generally obedient, usually does what adults request (R) .167 .217 .166 .323
Often fights with other children or bullies them .249 .449 .341 .632
Often lies or cheats .263 .500 .367 .613
Steals from home, school or elsewhere .092 .255 .281 .527

Hyperactivity Subscale
Restless, overactive. cannot stay still for long .253 .508 .173 .470
Constantly fidgeting or squirming .292 .596 .336 .909
Easily distracted, concentration wanders .187 .192 .395 .162
Thinks things out before acting (R) −.076 −.081 −.101 .094
Sees tasks through to the end. good attention span (R) −.055 −.023 .186 .079

Peer Problems
Rather solitary, tends to play alone .397 .417 .050
Has at least one good friend (R) .202 .239 −.103
Generally liked by other children (R) .076 .121 −.004
Picked on or bullied by other children .513 .537 .405
Gets on better with adults than with other children .331 .344 .026

Confirmatory Factor Analysis Model Fit 1-factor model: 1-factor model:
χ2 (170) = 249.583, χ2 (170) = 299.959,
p=.170, CFI=.613, p<.001, CFI=.406,
RMSEA=.055; RMSEA=.086;
4-factor model: 3-factor model:
χ2 (164) = 215.674, χ2 (87) = 123.968,
p=.004, CFI=.749, p=.006, CFI=.782,
RMSEA=.045 RMSEA=.064

Note. (R) indicates item was reverse coded. Results indicate poor one-factor model fit. The 4-factor model did not converge using the time 2 data, which might be due to the smaller sample or low correlations among peer problems items. We refit the model by excluding items from Peer Problem subscale and examining the 3-factor model (reported in Table -Time 2).