Skip to main content
. 2018 Aug 23;13(8):e0200678. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0200678

Table 3. Associations between smartphone and self-reported measures of tie strength in a population of 737 young adults.

  Total population High face-to-face
contact frequency
(summary score = 20–24)
High non-face-to-face contact frequency (summary score = 20–24)
Smartphone measures per month N (%) OR 95%CI OR 95%CI
Frequency of call interactions per alter          
0–3 calls 221 (30.0) 1 (Ref) 1 (Ref)
4–6 calls 380 (51.6) 2.85 (1.13;7.16) 2.36 (1.34;4.16)
7–9 calls  96 (13.0) 2.51 (0.77;8.22) 3.10 (1.54;6.28)
More than 9 calls 40 (5.4) 6.53 (1.98;21.47) 5.82 (2.55;13.28)
P-value (test for trend) 0.004 <0.0001
Frequency of text interactions per alter          
0–14 texts 298 (40.4) 1 (Ref) 1 (Ref)
15–29 texts 240 (32.6) 5.92 (1.94;18.10) 1.80 (1.09;2.98)
30–44 texts 100 (13.6) 5.48 (1.57;19.15) 2.01 (1.08;3.74)
More than 45 texts  99 (13.4) 11.44 (3.63;36.04) 1.58 (0.83;3.02)
P-value (test for trend)   <0.0001 0.072
Call duration
up to 1 hr 160 (21.7) 1 (Ref) 1 (Ref)
1–2 hrs 150 (20.4) 2.43 (0.89;6.66) 1.86 (0.92;3.75)
2–3 hrs 140 (19.0) 2.86 (0.98;8.34) 1.86 (0.90;3.85)
More than 3 hrs 287 (38.9) 3.02 (1.17;7.77) 2.84 (1.51;5.35)
P-value (test for trend) 0.029 0.001
Call reciprocity*          
0–3 reciprocated ties 145 (19.9) 1 (Ref) 1 (Ref)
4–6 reciprocated ties 245 (33.7) 1.31 (0.50;3.39) 1.44 (0.72;2.88)
7–9 reciprocated ties 167 (22.9) 2.60 (0.98;6.90) 2.61 (1.30;5.26)
More than 9 171 (23.5) 2.04 (0.73;5.74) 3.47 (1.74;6.93)
P-value (test for trend) 0.069 <0.0001
Text reciprocity          
0–6 reciprocated ties 82 (11.1) 1 (Ref) 1 (Ref)
7–12 reciprocated ties 205 (27.8) 2.23 (0.61;8.12) 1.72 (0.75;3.92)
13–18 reciprocated ties 209 (28.4) 1.89 (0.50;7.13) 1.56 (0.67;3.59)
More than 18 241 (32.7) 4.09 (1.09;15.31) 2.23 (0.98;5.08)
P-value (test for trend) 0.040 0.079

OR = Odds ratio, 95%CI = 95% confidence interval. All OR adjusted for age, gender, and co-habitation.

*9 observations excluded because of no calling activity.