Skip to main content
. 2018 Aug 23;13(8):e0202858. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0202858

Table 1. Comparison of DNA extraction methods.

Extraction Method Manual
Time (hr)
Automated
Time (hr)
A260/A280
mean ± s.d.
A260/A230
mean ± s.d.
Amplification
QIAmp® PowerFecal® 1.5–2 N/A 1.84 ± 0.02 1.68 ± 0.23 40/40
Maxwell RSC PureFood GMA Authentication 0.5 0.6 2.04 ± 0.03 1.86 ± 0.15 39/40

Time of extraction method determined from start of fecal processing to DNA elution and separated into manual and automated components. Mean 260/280 nm and 260/230 nm absorbance ratios (± s.d.) for each extraction method. With respect to more stringent filtering associated with DADA2, successful amplification was defined as minimal coverage of 100 reads per sample. n = 40 per extraction method.