Skip to main content
. 2018 Apr 24;42(4):296–307. doi: 10.4093/dmj.2017.0106

Table 5. Sex distribution of HOMA-IR cut-off levels based on sensitivity and specificity for T2DM in different age groups.

Age, yr Incidence AUC (95% CI) P valuea ROC coefficientsb Youden index criteria
Sensitivity, % Specificity, %
Men
 20–30s 9 (1.7) 0.804 (0.646–0.962) .020 −0.035 66.7 82.7
 40s 20 (5.9) 0.842 (0.764–0.919) 70.0 81.8
 50s 33 (8.2) 0.869 (0.814–0.925) 72.7 87.3
 60s 37 (11.1) 0.704 (0.614–0.794) 40.5 81.2
 70s 21 (8.1) 0.736 (0.628–0.844) 42.9 90.3
Women
 20–30s 11 (1.7) 0.991 (0.982–1.000) <0.001 −0.092c 100 82.3
 40s 12 (2.5) 0.946 (0.898–0.993) 91.7 86.1
 50s 19 (3.4) 0.839 (0.748–0.930) 73.7 81.9
 60s 25 (6.2) 0.760 (0.648–0.872) 68.0 76.6
 70s 28 (8.3) 0.736 (0.656–0.816) 57.1 70.8

Values are presented as number (%).

HOMA-IR, homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance; T2DM, type 2 diabetes mellitus; AUC, area under the curve; CI, confidence interval; ROC, receiver-operating characteristic operation.

aP value for difference of AUC values between age group, bP value for linear trend of AUC values by age group, cP<0.05.