Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Psychol Assess. 2018 Jun 21;30(9):1174–1185. doi: 10.1037/pas0000564

Table 1.

Fit Indices for the One-Factor, Second-Order, and Bifactor SDQ-DP Models in Three Developmental Periods across Three Different Reporters

Reporter Developmental Period Model N χ2 df RMSEA RMSEA 90% CI CFI TLI Δχ2
Parents Early Childhood Bifactor 498 231.901 76 .064 [.055 – .074] .954 .937
Second-Order 498 315.327 87 .073 [.064 – .081] .933 .919 2 vs. 1 (11) = 79.451, p < .001
One-Factor 498 697.866 90 .116 [.108 – .125] .822 .793 3 vs. 2 (3) = 177.426, p < .001
Middle Childhood Bifactor 446 223.789 76 .066 [.056 – .076] .953 .935
Second-Order 446 280.757 87 .071 [.062 – .080] .938 .925 2 vs. 1 (11) = 55.004, p < .001
One-Factor 446 634.314 90 .116 [.108 – .125] .826 .797 3 vs. 2 (3) = 163.070, p < .001
Adolescence Bifactor 352 144.659 76 .051 [.038 – .063] .975 .966
Second-Order 352 182.130 87 .056 [.044 – .067] .966 .959 2 vs. 1 (11) = .38.286, p < .001
One-Factor 352 315.673 90 .084 [.074 – .095] .919 .905 3 vs. 2 (3) = 63.568, p < .001
Teachers Early Childhood Bifactor 678 327.900 76 .070 [.062 – .078] .982 .975
Second-Order 678 504.522 87 .084 [.077 – .091] .969 .963 2 vs. 1 (11) = 125.433, p < .001
One-Factor 678 1771.837 90 .166 [.159 – .173] .877 .857 3 vs. 2 (3) = 427.096, p < .001
Middle Childhood Bifactor 528 277.347 75 .071 [.063 – .081] .974 .964
Second-Order 528 565.903 87 .102 [.094 – .110] .939 .927 2 vs. 1 (12) = 196.821, p < .001
One-Factor 528 1274.537 90 .158 [.150 – .166] .850 .825 3 vs. 2 (3) = 252.397, p < .001
Adolescence Bifactor 437 210.401 75 .064 [.054 – .075] .978 .969
Second-Order 437 353.954 87 .084 [.075 – .093] .957 .948 2 vs. 1 (12) = 114.941, p < .001
One-Factor 437 752.857 90 .130 [.121 – .138] .892 .875 3 vs. 2 (3) = 149.534, p < .001
Children Adolescence Bifactor 505 232.328 75 .064 [.055 – .074] .944 .922
Second-Order 505 345.062 87 .077 [.068 – .085] .908 .889 2 vs. 1 (12) = 97.898, p < .001
One-Factor 505 647.086 90 .111 [.103 – .119] .801 .768 3 vs. 2 (3) = 164.440, p < .001

Note. Degrees of freedom can differ due to restriction of factor loadings because of errors (see main text).