Ashton et al. [67] |
Australian magpie (C. tibicen dorsalis) |
behavioural inhibition, associative learning, reversal learning, spatial memory |
group size |
repeated testing of juveniles at 100, 200 and 300 days post-fledging |
positive |
positive relationship between cognitive performance and female reproductive success |
Sallet et al. [68] |
rhesus macaque, Macaca mulatta
|
size of various brain regions |
social network size |
not tested |
positive |
positive relationship between brain size and social dominance |
Fischer et al. [69] |
cichlid, Neolamprologus pulcher
|
size of various brain regions |
rearing group size |
not at the individual level, but treatment groups reared in isolation for different lengths of time |
positive |
not tested |
Gonda et al. [70] |
nine-spined stickleback, Pungitius pungitius
|
size of various brain regions |
group size |
not tested |
positive |
not tested |
Fowler et al. [71] |
prairie vole, Microtus ochrogaster
|
size of various brain regions |
isolation versus male exposure |
not at the individual level, but treatment groups reared in isolation for different lengths of time |
positive |
not tested |
Lipkind et al. [72] |
zebra finch, Taenogypia guttata
|
neuron number |
group size |
not tested |
positive |
not tested |
Gonda et al. [73] |
common frog, Rana temporaria
|
size of various brain regions |
tadpole density |
not tested |
positive |
not tested |
Trokovic et al. [74] |
R. temporaria |
optic tecta |
tadpole density |
carry over effect from tadpole to froglet |
positive |
not tested |
Ott & Rogers [75] |
desert locust, Schistocerca gregaria
|
size of various brain regions |
solitary versus gregarious |
not tested |
positive |
not tested |
Branchi et al. [76] |
house mouse, Mus musculus
|
nerve growth factor |
communal nest versus standard nest |
not tested |
positive |
not tested |
Dalesman [77] |
pond snail, Lymnaea stagnalis
|
long-term memory |
group living versus isolation |
not tested |
positive |
not tested |
Arnold & Taborsky [78] |
cichlid, N. pulcher
|
social competence |
parents and helpers versus no adults |
not tested |
positive |
not tested |
Taborsky et al. [79] |
cichlid, N. pulcher
|
social competence |
reared with older versus reared with same age conspecifics |
not tested |
positive |
not tested |
Seid & Junge [80] |
ant, Camponotus floridanus
|
mushroom bodies |
isolation versus groups |
not at the individual level, but treatment groups reared in isolation for different lengths |
positive |
not tested |
Smith et al. [81] |
sweat bee, Megalopta genalis
|
mushroom bodies |
social reproductives versus solitary reproductives |
not tested |
positive |
not tested |
Ehmer et al. [82] |
paper wasp, Polistes dominulus
|
size of various brain regions |
single foundress versus multiple foundress |
not tested |
positive |
not tested |
Amitai et al. [83] |
rat, Rattus norvegicus
|
reversal learning |
isolation reared versus socially reared |
not tested |
positive |
not tested |
Bianchi et al. [84] |
rat, R. norvegicus
|
novel object recognition task |
isolation reared versus socially reared |
not tested |
positive |
not tested |
Lu et al. [85] |
rat, R. norvegicus
|
learning and spatial memory |
group reared versus isolation reared |
not at the individual level, but treatment groups reared in isolation for different lengths. |
positive |
not tested |
Wongwitdecha & Marsden [86] |
rat, R. norvegicus
|
place learning, reversal learning |
isolation reared versus group reared |
not tested |
negative |
not tested |
Frisone et al. [87] |
rat, R. norvegicus
|
spatial memory |
isolation reared versus group reared |
tested as juveniles and adults |
mixed (negative and positive) |
not tested |
Riley et al. [88] |
tree skink, Egernia striolata
|
motor, discrimination, and reversal learning |
isolation reared versus group reared |
not tested |
no effect |
not tested |