Skip to main content
. 2018 Aug 13;373(1756):20170288. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2017.0288

Table 2.

Studies investigating the relationship between the social environment and individual cognitive performance/neuroanatomy in non-human animals (note this is an illustrative sample of studies, not a comprehensive list).

study study species measure of cognition measure of sociality longitudinal testing? effect of sociality on measure of cognition? fitness consequences?
Ashton et al. [67] Australian magpie (C. tibicen dorsalis) behavioural inhibition, associative learning, reversal learning, spatial memory group size repeated testing of juveniles at 100, 200 and 300 days post-fledging positive positive relationship between cognitive performance and female reproductive success
Sallet et al. [68] rhesus macaque, Macaca mulatta size of various brain regions social network size not tested positive positive relationship between brain size and social dominance
Fischer et al. [69] cichlid, Neolamprologus pulcher size of various brain regions rearing group size not at the individual level, but treatment groups reared in isolation for different lengths of time positive not tested
Gonda et al. [70] nine-spined stickleback, Pungitius pungitius size of various brain regions group size not tested positive not tested
Fowler et al. [71] prairie vole, Microtus ochrogaster size of various brain regions isolation versus male exposure not at the individual level, but treatment groups reared in isolation for different lengths of time positive not tested
Lipkind et al. [72] zebra finch, Taenogypia guttata neuron number group size not tested positive not tested
Gonda et al. [73] common frog, Rana temporaria size of various brain regions tadpole density not tested positive not tested
Trokovic et al. [74] R. temporaria optic tecta tadpole density carry over effect from tadpole to froglet positive not tested
Ott & Rogers [75] desert locust, Schistocerca gregaria size of various brain regions solitary versus gregarious not tested positive not tested
Branchi et al. [76] house mouse, Mus musculus nerve growth factor communal nest versus standard nest not tested positive not tested
Dalesman [77] pond snail, Lymnaea stagnalis long-term memory group living versus isolation not tested positive not tested
Arnold & Taborsky [78] cichlid, N. pulcher social competence parents and helpers versus no adults not tested positive not tested
Taborsky et al. [79] cichlid, N. pulcher social competence reared with older versus reared with same age conspecifics not tested positive not tested
Seid & Junge [80] ant, Camponotus floridanus mushroom bodies isolation versus groups not at the individual level, but treatment groups reared in isolation for different lengths positive not tested
Smith et al. [81] sweat bee, Megalopta genalis mushroom bodies social reproductives versus solitary reproductives not tested positive not tested
Ehmer et al. [82] paper wasp, Polistes dominulus size of various brain regions single foundress versus multiple foundress not tested positive not tested
Amitai et al. [83] rat, Rattus norvegicus reversal learning isolation reared versus socially reared not tested positive not tested
Bianchi et al. [84] rat, R. norvegicus novel object recognition task isolation reared versus socially reared not tested positive not tested
Lu et al. [85] rat, R. norvegicus learning and spatial memory group reared versus isolation reared not at the individual level, but treatment groups reared in isolation for different lengths. positive not tested
Wongwitdecha & Marsden [86] rat, R. norvegicus place learning, reversal learning isolation reared versus group reared not tested negative not tested
Frisone et al. [87] rat, R. norvegicus spatial memory isolation reared versus group reared tested as juveniles and adults mixed (negative and positive) not tested
Riley et al. [88] tree skink, Egernia striolata motor, discrimination, and reversal learning isolation reared versus group reared not tested no effect not tested