Skip to main content
. 2018 Aug 23;9:3391. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-05747-8

Table 2.

Effect of monogenic mutation or polygenic score on LDL-C in mg/dl

Monogenic mutation or high polygenic score
Ancestry N total Monogenic carrier (N) High polygenic score (N) Monogenic carrier β (mg/dl) Monogenic carrier SE Monogenic carrier P-value Highpolygenic score β (mg/dl) High polygenic score SE High polygenic score P-value
EA 5910 18 297 29.98 8.07 2.1 × 10−4 33.07 2.05 1.7 × 10−57
AA 4380 25 220 41.05 7.93 2.3 × 10−7 16.96 2.74 6.4 × 10−10
Monogenic mutation or low polygenic score
Ancestry N total Monogenic carrier ( N ) Low polygenic score ( N ) Monogenic carrier β (mg/dl) Monogenic carrier SE Monogenic carrier P -value Low polygenic score β (mg/dl) Low polygenic score SE Low polygenic score P -value
EA 5910 12 297 −47.25 9.55 7.7 × 10−7 −35.00 2.00 7.9 × 10−67
AA 4380 28 220 −41.41 7.47 3.1 × 10−8 −20.41 2.74 1.1 × 10−13

Values are represented as beta [95% CI] in mg/dl for LDL-C. Multi-variable associations were performed with sex + age + age2 (effects not listed) with monogenic carrier status + high polygenic score using linear regression. Polygenic risk score was derived from 2 million variants using LDpred. High polygenic score was defined as membership in the top 5th percentile of the ancestry-specific score distribution. AA, African American; EA, European American; SE, standard error.