Skip to main content
. 2018 Aug 23;8:12657. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-31174-2

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Muscle Synergies extracted at baseline. Four muscles synergies could well represent the whole dataset (a). The RMS values of the activation patterns of each synergy at each target were used to represent the spatial boundaries of each module in the workspace (b). The modules (a) extracted during B3 were used to estimate the activation patterns able to describe the movements in all the blocks. We found that the four original synergies were able to represent the data with acceptable median VAF (>80%) in each block (c). The VAF calculated for each block (red errorbars, indicating median and standard error) were significantly higher than the ones obtained using random modules (green errorbars). For each block statistical significance was estimated using Mann-Whitney U test and Bonferroni’s correction.