Skip to main content
. 2018 Aug 17;12:561. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2018.00561

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Ca2+-permeability of ChRGR. (A) Light-evoked whole cell currents from a ND 7/23 cell expressing ChRGR in a extracellular solution (pH 8.4) containing 0.1 mM [Ca2+]o (Low, top traces; whole cell capacitance = 37 pF), or from another cell with 10 mM [Ca2+]o (High, bottom traces; 39 pF), both at holding potentials of −80, −60, −40, −20, 0, and 20 mV. Each cyan line shows the timing of the irradiation (475 ± 28 nm, 1.3 mWmm−2). (B) The current-voltage (I-V) relationship of the steady-state photocurrent (Iss). Mean ± SEM (Low: n = 6, High: n = 7) after standardized by the cell capacitance and expressed as pA/pF. (C) Box-and-whisker plots comparing the reversal potential between Low (n = 6) and High (n = 7) [Ca2+]o. *P < 0.05 and **P < 0.005, Mann-Whitney U-test.