Skip to main content
. 2015 May 22;20(6):865–890. doi: 10.1007/s11027-015-9654-z

Table 1.

Overview of characteristics of assessments at different scales

Supra-national (global/continental) Macro (national) Meso (regional, province) Micro (local, city)
Resolution (DEM) 1–10 km 100 m–1 km ∼25–100 m ∼1–25 m
Hazard estimation -Global river flood model
-Surge heights (coastal)
-Generic flood model
-Aggregation of hydraulic simulations
-Rainfal-runoff plus 2D hydraulic modelling or simplification -2D hydraulic modelling
Consequence estimation -Gridded GDP or population in flood zone -Land use and stage-damage curves -Land use and stage-damage curves -Stage-damage curves for individual buildings
Uncertainty -Presence of flood defences important unknown (ontological) -Inundation modelling at course scale (ontological/epistemic) -Failure of defences (epistemic)
-Probability event (aleatory)
-Damage calculation (epistemic)
-Hydraulic modelling (epistemic)
-Failure of defences (epistemic)
-Probability event (aleatory)
-Damage calculation (epistemic)
Validation Aggregated datasets (EM-DAT, NatCatSERVICE) Absolute totals seem overestimated Limited to aggregate damages Possible for recent events with well-documented damages
Academic application -Assessment
-Effect climate change and population growth
-Assessment
-Effect climate change and population growth
-Effect of measures
-Future developments
-Uncertainty analyses
-Effect of measures
-Evaluate different strategies
-Validation of methodologies
Societal use -Disaster relief funds
-Re-insurance
-Multi-nationals
-National insurance programme
-Communication and awareness
-Controlling local development
-Prioritisation investments
-Support planning
-Communication and awareness
-Evaluating specific measures
-Optimise investments
-Support local management and planning