Skip to main content
. 2015 Jan 10;21(6):839–859. doi: 10.1007/s11027-014-9627-7

Table 1.

Examples of approaches to tracking adaptation

Emphasis of the approach Description Relevant measures Sources of information

Progress

e.g., Gagnon-Lebrun and Agrawala (2007)

• Emphasis on progress made by governments, NGOs, private sector etc. from articulating adaptation goals to planning and implementation

• Views concrete action as more valuable than groundwork

• Have there been vulnerability and impact assessments tailored to the scale, sector, region of focus?

• Have different adaptation options been identified?

• Have adaptation policies been formulated?

• Has adaptation been explicitly incorporated into projects?

• Have adaptation measures been implemented?

• Has there been learning from past adaptation experience?

• UNFCCC National Communications

• UNFCCC Private Sector Initiative

• National/regional/sectoral adaptation assessments

• Peer reviewed scholarship

• Organization websites (e.g., government, civil society organization, health authority)

• Legislation

• Adaptation databases

Process

e.g., Fussel (2008)

Mukheibir and Ziervogel (2008)

• Emphasis on procedural aspects of adaptation policy/planning

• Views coherent policy-making process to be more likely to produce effective adaptation

• Is there a clear procedural structure in the policy-making process?

• Is there evidence of localized impact assessments?

• Is there evidence of building M&E into the adaptation process?

• Is there evidence of inclusion of key stakeholders?

• Have adaptation concerns been prioritized in the policy-making domain?

• Has adaptation been incorporated into the development process?

• Has adaptation been incorporated into Disaster Risk Reduction programs?

• Is there a prioritization among adaptation policies

• How are uncertainties being managed?

• Adaptation planning documents

Adaptation program descriptions

• Consultation documents

• Boundary organizations

• Institutional structure analysis

• Adaptation readiness evaluations

• Program development

• Decision maker surveys

Diversity

e.g., Carmin et al (2012) Lesnikowski et al (2011; 2014)

• Emphasis on the need to tackle vulnerability across sectors

• Values variety of adaptation policies

• Values diversity of impacts and sectors addressed

• Highlights the importance of diverse typologies to address different problems

• How many/which impacts are being addressed?

• How many/which sectors are being strengthened?

• Which policy typologies are being used (e.g., direct management vs. soft and open policies)

• Government policy summaries

• Sectoral adaptation reports (e.g., transportation ministries, utilities ministries, port authorities)

• Global/regional/local surveys of adaptation activity

• UNFCCC National Communications

• IPCC Assessment Reports

Quality

e.g., Dupuis and Biesbroek (2013)

• Evaluates the success of policy on increasing resilience Emphasis on purposeful and substantive aspects of adaptation policy

• Outcome oriented, examining the quality of existing adaptation policies

• Is the policy explicitly designed to manage the impacts of climate change?

• Does the policy reduce climate change vulnerability?

• Documents monitoring implementation

• Independent program evaluation

• NGO/private sector assessments

• Public and private policy analyses

• Peer reviewed scholarship