Table 3.
Area | Themes | Sub-themes |
---|---|---|
Acceptability | To what extent do health providers accept SST? | |
Of SST for control of malaria in pregnancy | SST is good because it is important to detect malaria early in pregnancy, pregnancy is risky time; SST should be continued; SST is a good policy but only if it is in fact being carried out and the quality is improved | |
Of RDTs vs microscopy | RDTs are not always accurate; RDTs are easy to use and a good alternative if there are no lab services or for use in the field; RDTs are useful but we may still need to confirm result with microscope | |
Of DP | Most participants reported no challenges with DP use; DP was not always immediately effective DP can produce mild side effects in some women (nausea, vomiting, dizziness) |
|
Demand | To what extent is SST perceived to have positive effects, to be used, and demanded by PW? | |
For SST by pregnant women (perceived by health providers) | Awareness about screening is low and some pregnant women don’t go for screening despite being advised, e.g. transportation costs; lack of motivation to attend health facilities; women question why they are being tested when they have no complaints |