Table 3. Educational impact of DOPS assessment method .
Author: year | Country | Participants | Intervention | Results and conclusion |
Tsui K, et al., 2013(35) | Taiwan | Students | Validity of students’ measurement of prostate volume in predicting treatment outcomes | DOPS assessment improved students’ prostate volume measurement skills (Cronbach’s a > 0.70). |
Profanter C and Perathoner A, 2015(36) | Austria | 193 fourth year students | Prospective randomized trial (DOPS vs. classical tutor system); surgical skills-lab course | DOPS group has high level of clinical skills. DOPS dimensions seem to improve tutoring and rates of performance. |
Scott DJ, et al., 2000(37) | USA | 22 junior surgery residents | 2 weeks of formal video training | Trained group had significantly better performance than control group based on the assessment through direct observation (P = 0.02) compared to video tape assessment (NS). DOPS showed improved performance of participants after formal skills training on a video trainer. |
Shahgheibi Sh et al., 2009(38) | Iran |
73 medical students (42 control & 31 intervention) |
Evaluation of the effects of DOPS on clinical externship of students learning level in obstetrics ward |
DOPS group had significantly improved their skills than control group (p = 0.001). DOPS can be more useful in improving students' skill. |
Morris A, et al., 2006(39) | UK | 27 preregistration house officer | Perceptions of preregistration house officer | Participants mentioned that DOPS can improve their clinical skills as well as their future careers. |
Hengameh H, et al., 2015 (40) | Iran | Nursing students | Comparing the effect of DOPS and routine assessment method | DOPS has significantly improved nursing students' clinical skills (p = 0.000). |
Nazari R et a., :2013(41) | Iran | 39 nursing students | Comparing the effect of DOPS and routine assessment method | DOPS has significantly improved nursing students' clinical skills (p < 0.001). |
Dabhadkar S, et al., 2014(32) | India | 7 second year postgraduate students of OBGY | Assessment impact of DOPS on students' learning | Five of 6 students who performed unsatisfactorily in the first round of DOPS moved to satisfactory level of performance in the second round of DOPS. Participants showed improvement in the second round of DOPS. |
Amini A, et al., 2015(33) | Iran | 7 orthopedic residents and 9 faculty members | Assessment impact of DOPS on students' learning | Students' performance was improved in the second stage of DOPS (from 50.6% to 59.4%). DOPS assessment methods had an effective role in increased level of students’ learning and skills. |
Bagheri M, et al., 2014(42) | Iran | Emergency medicine students (25 in experiment and 21 in control group) | Assessment impact of DOPS on students' learning | Experimental group had significantly high mean scores compared to the control group (p = 0.0001, t = 4.9). |