Skip to main content
. 2018 Aug 17;6:109. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2018.00109

Figure 5.

Figure 5

(A) Evolution of the hydrodynamic diameter of PDA aggregates as a function of the surfactant concentration in the case of SDS (Inline graphic), HTAB (Inline graphic), and Triton X-100 (Inline graphic). The dopamine concentration was 2 mg.mL−1 in the presence of 50 mM Tris buffer at pH = 8.5 in all experiments. The long-dashed lines in the upper part of the figure correspond to the size of the PDA prepared in the absence of surfactant, whereas the short-dashed lines in the lower part of the figure corresponds to the size of the surfactant micelles [measured in the case of SDS (Inline graphic) and HTAB (Inline graphic)]. (B) Relative deposition of PDA films as calculated by dividing the thickness of the PDA films, obtained on silicon in the presence of a surfactant, by the film thickness obtained in the absence of a surfactant. The film thickness was obtained by means of single wavelength ellipsometry fixing the complex refractive index of PDA to 1.73 ± 0.02i at λ = 632.8 nm. The deposition of PDA on silicon was investigated in the presence of different concentrations of SDS (___Inline graphic___), HTAB (Inline graphic), sodium octylsulfate (Inline graphic), and Triton X-100 (Inline graphic). The error bars are calculated from the standard errors on the film thickness produced both in the absence and presence of surfactants. The long-dashed line has the same significance as in (A). Reproduced from Ponzio et al. (2014a) with authorization.