Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Consult Clin Psychol. 2018 Sep;86(9):751–764. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000326

Table 5.

Two-group comparison of model-based means and effect size estimates at post-treatment and two-year follow-up

Measure Time Point Study Group Means (SEs) Hedges’ g Effect Size Estimates (95% CI)
ICBT GCBT ICBT vs. GCBT
Child MASC Baseline 57.27 (1.21) 58.03 (1.25) NA
12-Week 47.78 (1.40) 48.05 (1.35) 0.02 (−0.31, 0.35)
2-Year 47.12 (1.18) 45.71 (1.16) −0.13 (−0.43, 0.16)
Parent MASC Baseline 54.77 (1.69) 58.91 (1.74) NA
12-Week 45.40 (2.03) 49.32 (1.95) 0.23 (−0.10, 0.57)
2-Year 42.30 (1.80) 40.67 (1.88) −0.10 (−0.42, 0.22)
CGAS Baseline 51.33 (0.56) 52.10 (0.58) NA
12-Week 63.03 (1.04) 62.69 (1.04) −0.04 (−0.36, 0.28)
2-Year 69.66 (1.34) 72.91 (1.33) 0.26 (−0.03, 0.56)

Note: ICBT = individual cognitive behavioral therapy; GCBT = group cognitive behavioral therapy; CI = confidence interval; MASC = Multidimensional Anxiety Scale for Children; CGAS = Child Global Assessment Scale.

Means presented are model based mean estimated at each time point. The following covariates were included (grand mean centered) in each model: Child age (at baseline), gender, number of comorbid disorders, baseline ADIS CSR ratings for each target anxiety disorder.

For effect size estimates, calculations were based on between-groups differences in estimated mean scores at Week 12 divided by the pooled standard deviation of the outcome at Week 12, otherwise known as Hedges’ g (95% CI).