Skip to main content
. 2018 Jul 17;126(7):076001. doi: 10.1289/EHP3067

Table 7.

Example of weight of evidence classifications.

Method/framework Reference Number of Classes Class title
Bayesian Inference Schleier et al. (2015) NA NA
Epid-Tox Adami et al. (2011) 4
  • Likely, Uncertain, Uncertain but plausible, Unlikely (Used to qualify the causal relationship between the environmental factor and the disease condition)

GRADE Andrews et al. (2013b) 4 Strong Against, Weak Against, Weak For, Strong For
Hope and Clarkson Hope and Clarkson (2014) 5 Weak, Not indicated, Not indicated, Not indicated, Strong
IARC IARC (2006) 5
  • Group 1: The agent is carcinogenic to humans

  • Group 2A: The agent is probably carcinogenic to humans

  • Group 2B: The agent is possibly carcinogenic to humans

  • Group 3: The agent is not classifiable as to its carcinogenicity to humans

  • Group 4: The agent is probably not carcinogenic to humans

Modified Bradford Hill Meek et al. (2014a); OECD (2014) 3 Weak, Moderate, Strong
Multi-criteria analysis Linkov et al. (2011) 6 Do nothing, Institutional control, Clay capping, Mechanical dredging, Hydraulic dredging, Hot spot dredging
NRC NRC (2014) 5 Carcinogenic to humans, Likely to be carcinogenic to humans, Suggestive evidence of carcinogenic potential, Inadequate information to assess carcinogenic potential, Not likely to be carcinogenic to humans
OHAT OHAT (2015) 5 (1) Known to be a hazard to humans, (2) Presumed to be a hazard to humans, (3) Suspected to be a hazard to humans, (4) Not classifiable as a hazard to humans, or (5) Not identified as a hazard to humans
SR–Cochrane Higgins and Green (2011) 4 Very low, Low, Moderate, Strong
SR-EFSA EFSA (2010) NA NA
SCENIHR SCENIHR (2012) 5 Weighting not possible, Uncertain, Weak, Moderate, Strong
WCRF/AICR WCRF/AICR (2014) 5 Convincing/Probable/Limited - suggestive/Limited - no conclusion/Substantial effect on risk unlikely

Note: EFSA, European Food Safety Authority; GRADE, Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation; NA, Not applicable because the corresponding step was not addressed by the approach; NRC, U.S. National Research Council; OHAT, Office of Health Assessment and Translation; SCENIHR, Scientific Committee on Emerging and Newly Identified Health Risks; SR, Systematic Review; WCRF/AICR, World Cancer Research Fund and American Institute for Cancer Research.