Table 1.
Participant details | Stroke details | Balance assessment | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Age (years) | Gender | BMI (kg/m2) | SCQ (score) | Affected functional area (self-reported) | Time after stroke (weeks) | SIS mobility | BBS (score) | DGI (score) | ABC (score) | TUGT (s) | ST (score) | |
1CBT | 75 | m | 25.9 | 3 | UL/l | 23 | 97 | 53 | 20 | 92 | 8.4 | 52.3 |
2CBT | 72 | f | 26.8 | 10 | UL + LL/r | 18 | 97 | 53 | 23 | 99 | 6.5 | 32.0 |
3CBT | 70 | f | 25.7 | 18 | C + V | 15 | 92 | 53 | 24 | 87 | 8.1 | 29.8 |
4CBT | 77 | m | 29.4 | 8 | LL/l | 22 | 92 | 48 | 23 | 91 | 9.1 | 63.7 |
5CBT | 63 | m | 31.2 | 4 | C | 23 | 100 | 56 | 24 | 99 | 7.7 | 48.5 |
6CBT | 84 | f | 28.7 | 9 | C + V | 13 | 78 | 26 | 14 | 45 | 18.0 | 74.7 |
1WBT | 85 | m | 28.4 | 2 | UL/l | 21 | 100 | 56 | 23 | 96 | 8.1 | 36.6 |
2WBT | 70 | m | 27.8 | 2 | UL + LL/r | 19 | 97 | 55 | 24 | 97 | 8.6 | 30.9 |
3WBT | 62 | m | 22.8 | 2 | C + V | 20 | 100 | 56 | 24 | 100 | 11.1 | 14.8 |
4WBT | 71 | m | 26.8 | 2 | C + V | 17 | 100 | 54 | 23 | 99 | 7.4 | 30.0 |
5WBT | 85 | f | 23.9 | 7 | C + V + LL | 13 | 56 | 24 | 5 | 65 | (116.0)* | –** |
Mean (SD) | 74.0 (8.1) | 27.0 (2.4) | 6.1 (5.0) | 18.6 (3.8) | 91.7 (13.7) | 48.5 (11.9) | 20.6 (6.0) | 88.2 (17.4) | 9.3 (3.3) | 39.0 (18.9) |
Note: CBT conventional balance training, WBT Wii™ balance training, m male, f female, UL upper limb, LL lower limb, l left body side, r right body side, C communication, V vision, SCQ Self-Administered Comorbidity Questionnaire, SIS Stroke Impact Scale, BBS Berg Balance Scale, DGI Dynamic Gait Index, ABC Scale Activities-specific Balance Confidence Scale, TUGT Timed Up and Go Test, ST stability indicator (posturography); *the test result was not taken into account for the mean value, since the test was not carried out in accordance with the protocol at t0 (testing without walking aid although this is used continuously in everyday life); **no measurement because unsupported standing with closed eyes was not possible