Skip to main content
. 2018 Aug 25;4:143. doi: 10.1186/s40814-018-0334-0

Table 1.

Sample characteristics at baseline (t0)

Participant details Stroke details Balance assessment
Age (years) Gender BMI (kg/m2) SCQ (score) Affected functional area (self-reported) Time after stroke (weeks) SIS mobility BBS (score) DGI (score) ABC (score) TUGT (s) ST (score)
1CBT 75 m 25.9 3 UL/l 23 97 53 20 92 8.4 52.3
2CBT 72 f 26.8 10 UL + LL/r 18 97 53 23 99 6.5 32.0
3CBT 70 f 25.7 18 C + V 15 92 53 24 87 8.1 29.8
4CBT 77 m 29.4 8 LL/l 22 92 48 23 91 9.1 63.7
5CBT 63 m 31.2 4 C 23 100 56 24 99 7.7 48.5
6CBT 84 f 28.7 9 C + V 13 78 26 14 45 18.0 74.7
1WBT 85 m 28.4 2 UL/l 21 100 56 23 96 8.1 36.6
2WBT 70 m 27.8 2 UL + LL/r 19 97 55 24 97 8.6 30.9
3WBT 62 m 22.8 2 C + V 20 100 56 24 100 11.1 14.8
4WBT 71 m 26.8 2 C + V 17 100 54 23 99 7.4 30.0
5WBT 85 f 23.9 7 C + V + LL 13 56 24 5 65 (116.0)* –**
Mean (SD) 74.0 (8.1) 27.0 (2.4) 6.1 (5.0) 18.6 (3.8) 91.7 (13.7) 48.5 (11.9) 20.6 (6.0) 88.2 (17.4) 9.3 (3.3) 39.0 (18.9)

Note: CBT conventional balance training, WBT Wii™ balance training, m male, f female, UL upper limb, LL lower limb, l left body side, r right body side, C communication, V vision, SCQ Self-Administered Comorbidity Questionnaire, SIS Stroke Impact Scale, BBS Berg Balance Scale, DGI Dynamic Gait Index, ABC Scale Activities-specific Balance Confidence Scale, TUGT Timed Up and Go Test, ST stability indicator (posturography); *the test result was not taken into account for the mean value, since the test was not carried out in accordance with the protocol at t0 (testing without walking aid although this is used continuously in everyday life); **no measurement because unsupported standing with closed eyes was not possible