Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Aug 25.
Published in final edited form as: Science. 2018 Apr 20;360(6386):336–341. doi: 10.1126/science.aao1785

Fig. 2. Small molecule mimetics of Mfn2 HR1 amino acid side chains that interact with HR2 are mitofusin agonists.

Fig. 2

(A) (top) Three dimensional representations of hypothetical minipeptide conformations driven by Ser378 phosphorylation, and (bottom) their respective small molecule mimetics. (B) Dose-dependent mitofusin agonism by small molecule agonists. Data represent mean±SEM of 6 independent experiments. (C) Displacement of minipeptide 374–384 from its HR2 binding site by mitofusin agonists. Data represent mean±SEM of 3 independent experiments. (D) Restoration of Mfn2 T105M-impaired mitochondrial fusion in Mfn2−/− MEFs by mitofusin agonists. Data represent mean ± SEM of 3 or 4 independent experiments as indicated. p values were measured by ANOVA. (E) Selectivity of a class A, but not a class B, mitofusin agonist for Ser378-phosphorylated Mfn2.. Data represent mean ± SEM of 4 independent experiments. p values were measured by ANOVA (F) Impaired basal function, but normal proportional agonist responsiveness, of Mfn2 mutations altering HR1-HR2 interacting amino acids. Absolute fusogenicity of these Mfn2 mutants is in fig. S6. Data represent mean±SEM of 4 independent experiments. p values are by ANOVA (left) or Student’s t test. (G) Change in FRET evoked by mitofusin agonists in isolated mitochondria (left) and intact cells (right); decreased FRET reflects conformational opening. Data represent mean±SEM of 3 independent (left) and 14–16 replicate (right) experiments. p values vs vehicle were measured by ANOVA.