Table 2.
Trial | Line in the metastatic setting | Patients (n) | Treatment | HR for PFS | Median PFS, months | Objective response rate (ITT population) (%) |
PALOMA-2 | 1L | 666 | Palbociclib + letrozole vs placebo + letrozole | 0.58 | 24.8 vs 14.5 | 42.1 vs 34.7 |
PALOMA-3 | >1L | 521 | Palbociclib + fulvestrant vs placebo + fulvestrant | 0.46 | 9.5 vs 4.6 | 19 vs 8 |
MONALEESA-2 | 1L | 668 | Ribociclib + letrozole vs placebo + letrozole | 0.56 | NR vs 14.7 | 40.7 vs 27.5 |
MONARCH 3 | 1L | 493 | Abemaciclib + NSAI vs placebo + NSAI |
0.54 | NR vs 14.7 | 59 vs 44 |
MONARCH 2 | 1L or 2L | 669 | Abemaciclib + fulvestrant vs placebo + fulvestrant | 0.55 | 16.4 vs 9.3 | 48.1 vs 21.3 |
ITT, intentiontion to treat; NR, not reached; NSAI, non-steroidal aromatase inhibitor.