Table 2.
Results of Study 1: Dyadic path modeling of global fear of cancer recurrence (FCR)
Effect | Estimate | Standard Error | 95% CI | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Lower | Upper | |||
Outcome: Patient FCR | ||||
Patient social constraintsa | 0.561* | 0.249 | 0.072 | 1.049 |
Spouse social constraints | −0.063 | 0.390 | −0.827 | 0.700 |
Patient relationship quality | −0.002 | 0.022 | −0.045 | 0.041 |
Patient anxiety | 0.672* | 0.295 | 0.093 | 1.251 |
Patient physical symptoms | 0.019 | 0.015 | −0.010 | 0.047 |
Patient age | −0.025† | 0.013 | −0.051 | 0.001 |
Outcome: Spouse FCR | ||||
Spouse social constraintsa | 0.561* | 0.249 | 0.072 | 1.049 |
Patient social constraints | −0.258 | 0.402 | −1.046 | 0.531 |
Spouse relationship quality | 0.050* | 0.020 | 0.010 | 0.089 |
Spouse anxiety | 0.373 | 0.283 | −0.183 | 0.929 |
Patient physical symptoms | 0.027† | 0.014 | 0.000 | 0.054 |
Patient age | −0.028* | 0.013 | −0.052 | −0.003 |
Note. N = 46 couples. All estimates are unstandardized. A patient-spouse residual covariance was estimated but not reported. BC stage was initially included as a covariate represented by 3 dummy variables, none of which were significant predictors of patient or spouse FCR or changed the pattern of results; therefore, they were excluded from the final model for parsimony.
Corresponding coefficients constrained to be equal across partners.
p < .10.
p < .05.