Table 1.

Summary of the re-sequencing data from 20 lotus germplasms.

Sample name	Raw data (bp)	High-quality data (bp)	Total reads mapped (%)	Sequencing depth (X)	≥1× coverage
Chongtai lotus	9,332,930,700	9,299,393,400	97.73	11.88	97.74
Qianban lotus	10,335,317,700	10,302,705,900	98.07	12.86	98.49
Xingkongmudan	9,938,182,800	9,898,820,100	97.89	12.34	97.16
Fengjuanhongqi	8,730,950,400	8,700,571,500	97.82	11.07	96.61
Yuchan	9,218,801,100	9,183,069,300	98.16	11.58	97.21
Xiangbihe	9,150,490,500	9,114,393,300	97.40	11.56	97.28
Shuguangxiu	9,420,146,700	9,388,740,600	97.90	11.83	96.49
Donghuxinhong	9,874,330,800	9,846,971,100	98.09	12.45	97.08
Hongtai lotus	9,155,348,400	9,130,642,200	98.18	11.44	98.12
Number 689	10,176,733,800	10,123,365,300	97.77	12.82	95.66
Jinlingzhixing	10,802,341,200	10,769,308,500	97.95	13.32	97.90
Danyue	9,808,241,100	9,774,771,900	97.31	11.90	97.36
Zuidongfeng	10,461,610,800	10,426,700,100	98.16	12.87	98.62
Hongyun	11,131,869,900	11,098,322,100	98.21	13.56	98.25
Xiaoqu	10,054,341,600	10,009,623,900	98.03	12.50	97.34
Xiaojingling	9,525,178,800	9,502,553,100	96.97	11.60	97.61
Hong Hehuan	9,148,683,300	9,126,764,700	96.90	11.27	96.79
Jinlinghuodu	11,620,749,300	11,586,919,500	97.80	14.13	97.81
Qinhuaibaiyu	9,338,316,900	8,798,182,800	97.21	11.14	97.23
Hongchong	10,066,581,900	10,037,385,000	97.65	12.37	97.82
Total	197,291,147,700	196,119,204,300	–	–	–
Average	9,864,557,385	9,805,960,215	97.76	12.22	97.43