Skip to main content
. 2018 Aug 27;8:12896. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-31289-6

Table 4.

GDT loss predicted bt SAAP-QA for the CASP12 blind test set of stage 2 models of 18 target domains.

Stage 2 (150 models) - Protein Domains
Targets GDT Loss for top 10 ranked GDT Loss for top 5 ranked GDT Loss for top 1 ranked
T0893-D2 0 5.77 7.55
T0895-D1 2.09 4.8 3.54
T0902-D1 0 0.1 3.35
T0906-D1 0.22 0.22 3.97
T0910-D1 1.89 2.44 2.60
T0911-D1 0.37 0.37 3.49
T0912-D1 2.17 2.17 8.31
T0913-D1 1.77 1.77 1.77
T0917-D1 2.5 5.12 9.36
T0920-D1 4.52 4.52 6.24
T0920-D2 4.99 8.33 7.06
T0921-D1 1.45 2.71 19.21
T0928-D1 0.37 0.44 13.01
T0943-D2 0 0.62 4.03
T0944-D1 2.96 6.52 10.47
T0946-D2 0 0 3.66
T0947-D1 3.72 8.72 6.00
T0948-D1 1.85 1.85 1.68
Average GDT Loss 1.72 3.14 6.41

GDT loss corresponding to the difference between the best model available in the pool of decoys and the model captured by SAAP-QA, are listed for top 10, top 5 and top 1 category models.