Skip to main content
. 2018 Aug 27;8:12896. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-31289-6

Table 5.

GDT loss predicted by SAAP-QA for the CASP12 blind test set of stage 2 models of 17 target full length strutures.

Stage 2 (150 Models) - Full Length Protein
Targets Best GDT Top10 GDT Loss Top 5 GDT Loss Top 1 GDT Loss
T0893 61.98 0.52 0.52 4.86
T0895 72.92 0.00 0.00 0.00
T0902 50.75 2.42 2.92 3.17
T0906 91.90 1.05 1.96 4.05
T0910 87.91 3.28 3.81 5.15
T0911 65.99 0.74 3.98 6.62
T0912 47.79 5.47 5.47 6.05
T0913 66.57 0.37 0.37 5.55
T0917 84.18 4.90 4.90 4.90
T0920 50.42 4.45 4.45 8.29
T0921 70.65 0.18 0.18 0.18
T0928 63.27 0.59 0.59 11.44
T0943 60.61 8.55 8.94 14.10
T0944 74.11 1.19 3.36 12.85
T0946 45.21 0.00 0.09 2.41
T0947 66.43 2.00 8.57 8.57
T0948 76.68 3.02 3.02 5.21
Average GDT Loss 2.28 3.12 6.08

GDT loss corresponding to the difference between the best model available in the pool of decoys and the model captured by SAAP-QA, are listed for top 10, top 5 and top 1 category models. These full protein targets correspond to the 18 target domains listed in Table 3.