Skip to main content
. 2018 Aug 27;9:3464. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-05991-y

Table 2.

Landscape, local and regional effects on grassland plant specialist richness

Variable Para.Est. Lower Upper t p
Intercept 2.028 1.988 2.067 100.526 <0.001
Landscape
Present landscape open 0.024 0.009 0.038 3.220 0.001
Past landscape heterogeneity −0.037 −0.049 −0.024 −5.692 <0.001
Past landscape arable −0.080 −0.094 −0.066 −11.366 <0.001
Local
Grassland area (log) 0.178 0.162 0.195 20.863 <0.001
Grassland heterogeneity 0.220 0.206 0.234 30.769 <0.001
Area Fennoscandian species-rich dry-mesic lowland grassland (log) 0.254 0.241 0.267 38.445 <0.001
Area semi-natural dry grassland and shrubland on calcareous substrates (log) 0.116 0.105 0.128 19.451 <0.001
Grassland open habitat 0.069 0.055 0.082 9.730 <0.001
Grassland improvement −0.111 −0.125 −0.096 −14.958 <0.001
Region
Parameter compared to baseline factor Kronoberg county, which had the greatest change (reduction) in open cover in the study region Parameter estimate

Mean = −0.174,

Max = 0.109 (Uppsala),

Min = −0.526 (Blekinge)

p

All <0.001, except Värmland, Kalmar, Västra Götaland and Gotland (n/s)

Full generalised linear model explaining grassland specialist richness in 23,398 Swedish semi-natural grasslands including both landscape and local predictors along with region (county), including 95% confidence intervals. Full model output including values for all regions is available as Supplementary Table 2