Skip to main content
Deutsches Ärzteblatt International logoLink to Deutsches Ärzteblatt International
letter
. 2018 Jul 9;115(27-28):479. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2018.0479a

Correspondence (letter to the editor): E-Cigarettes and Quitting Tobacco

Peter Pommer *
PMCID: PMC6111208  PMID: 30064633

E-cigarettes are controversial in Germany because they initially do not disrupt nicotine dependence. The available evidence, by contrast, supports the use of e-cigarettes in quitting tobacco. Not without reason, the UK NHS favors this therapeutic approach (1, 2, 4). The UK government uses the published data in support of publicizing the benefits of e-cigarettes (4). A 2016 Cochrane review recognized benefits from successfully giving up tobacco cigarettes, and in the other subjects it acknowledged benefits owing to a reduction in the number of tobacco cigarettes consumed; the authors identified a need for more studies because the data are currently unsatisfactory. In 2018, this demand has already been met to a substantial degree.

A study recently published in The BMJ calculated a potential reduction in harm owing to using e-cigarettes that reached unexpected levels: by using e-cigarettes, 1.6 million premature deaths can be prevented over 10 years in the US alone if a pessimistic scenario is assumed. An optimistic assumption points to 6.6 million prevented premature deaths (2). Other studies too have found that e-cigarettes are suitable for quitting tobacco smoking.

A US study published in 2017 described an improvement in the rate of successful tobacco smoking cessation from 4.8% to 8.2% thanks to the use of e-cigarettes. Deutsches Ärzteblatt and the German Federal Ministry of Health too described the benefits of e-cigarettes in 2017, among other reasons because the hypothesis of the e-cigarette as a gateway drug seems to have been disproved (www.aerzteblatt.de/nachrichten/73991).

Different powerful lobby groups would like to see e-cigarettes to be presented in an unfavorable light because their turnovers and associated financial gains are at risk of being diminished.

Additional literature is available from the author.

Footnotes

Conflict of interest statement

The author declares that no conflict of interest exists.

References

  • 1.McNeill A, Brose LS, Calder R, Bauld L, Robson D. Public Health England. London: 2018. Evidence review of e-cigarettes and heated tobacco products 2018. A report commissioned by Public Health England. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Levy DT, Borland R, Lindblom EN, et al. Potential deaths averted in USA by replacing cigarettes with e-cigarettes. Tobacco Control. 2018;27:18–25. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2017-053759. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Zhu Shu-Hong, Zhuang Yue-Lin, Wong Shiushing, Cummins Sharon E, Tedeschi Gary J. E-cigarette use and associated changes in population smoking cessation: evidence from US current population surveys. BMJ. 2017;358 doi: 10.1136/bmj.j3262. j3262. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Morgenstern M, Nies A, Goecke M, Hanewinkel R. E-cigarettes and the use of conventional cigarettes—a cohort study in 10th grade students in Germany. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2018;115:243–248. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2018.0243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Deutsches Ärzteblatt International are provided here courtesy of Deutscher Arzte-Verlag GmbH

RESOURCES