Skip to main content
. 2017 Dec 20;60(12):3378–3392. doi: 10.1044/2017_JSLHR-S-16-0443

Table 1.

Characteristics of the study sample.

Characteristic Stroke Control (n = 13) Aphasia Only (n = 24) AOS-Aphasia (n = 20) Significant differences*
Mean age 64.8 ± 10.6 61.4 ± 9.2 58.9 ± 10.5 SC = AO = A-A
Men:Women 4:9 19:5 13:7
WAB AQ 98.4 ± 1.1 74.9 ± 20.2 64.2 ± 21.4 SC > AO > A-A
Aphasia types Anomic: 11 Anomic: 4
Broca's: 3 Broca's: 13
Conduction: 7 Global: 1
Wernicke's: 3 None: 2 a
ASRS AOS severity 0 0 2.8 ± 1.0 SC = AO
A-A > SC
A-A > AO
ASRS aphasia severity 0 1.6 ± 1.0 2.2 ± 1.3 SC < AO
SC < A-A
AO = A-A
ASRS dysarthria severity 0 0.1 ± 0.9 0.5 ± 0.8 SC = AO
SC < A-A
AO = A-A

Note. AOS = Apraxia of Speech; SC = Stroke Control; AO = Aphasia Only; A-A = AOS-Aphasia; WAB AQ = Western Aphasia Battery Aphasia Quotient; ASRS = Apraxia of Speech Rating Scale.

a

These two individuals were not aphasic according to WAB AQ cutoff criterion of 93.8.

*

Based on independent samples t tests, p < .05.