Skip to main content
. 2017 Dec 20;60(12):3378–3392. doi: 10.1044/2017_JSLHR-S-16-0443

Table 3.

Correlation coefficients (r denotes Pearson; r s denotes Spearman) between LDA input variables and WAB AQ scores.

Predictor Correlation coefficient
1 Hz–2 Hz band r = −.20, p = .14
4 Hz–8 Hz band r = .34,* p = .009
16 Hz–32 Hz band r = −.47,* p < .001
VOT-SDvoiced r s = −.09, p = .51
VOT-SDVoiceless r = −.23, p = .08
nPVI-V r = .22, p = .09
Distortion errors r s = −.48,* p < .001

Note. LDA = linear discriminant analysis; WAB AQ = Western Aphasia Battery Aphasia Quotient; VOT-SD = standard deviation of voice onset time; nPVI-V = normalized Pairwise Variability Index–Vowels.

*

Correlations significant at the Bonferroni-corrected p value of p = .007 (p = .05/7 comparisons).