Skip to main content
. 2017 Dec 20;60(12):3441–3455. doi: 10.1044/2017_JSLHR-S-17-0011

Table 3.

Predicting concurrent receptive vocabulary with measures of word processing and number of word stimuli understood.

Variable Coefficient SE t p ηp 2
T3 average amplitude to word model
 Intercept −41.92 29.75 −1.41 .169 .05
 T3 Avg Amp −1.82 8.81 −0.21 .838 .0007
 Words Understood 27.44 4.08 6.72 .000*** .61
 T3 Avg Amp × Words Understood −0.35 1.07 −0.33 .741 .005
P3 average amplitude to word model
 Intercept −43.22 29.87 −1.44 .158 .06
 P3 Avg Diff −1.34 14.24 −0.09 .926 .0002
 Words Understood 28.73 4.31 6.66 .000*** .61
 P3 Avg Amp × Words Understood 0.43 1.81 0.24 .815 .002
T3 average word–nonword difference model
 Intercept −37.20 26.53 −1.40 .1711 .05
 T3 Avg Diff 0.97 4.41 0.22 .8259 .003
 Words Understood 26.58 3.61 7.36 .000*** .65
 T3 Avg Diff × Words Understood −1.58 0.70 −2.26 .0309* .15
P3 average word–nonword difference model
 Intercept −42.19 30.25 −1.39 .173 .05
 P3 Avg Diff −1.93 8.13 −0.24 .814 .0004
 Words Understood 28.00 4.14 6.75 .000*** .62
 P3 Avg Diff × Words Understood −0.35 1.22 −0.29 .774 .005

Note. T3 = left temporal electrode cluster; Avg Amp = average amplitude to word between 200 and 500 ms after stimulus onset; Words Understood = number of word stimuli featured in the event-related potential paradigm reportedly understood by the participant; P3 = left parietal electrode cluster; Avg Diff = average difference between word and nonword amplitudes between 200 and 500 ms after stimulus onset.

*

p < .05.

***

p < .001.