Skip to main content
. 2018 Sep 5;131(17):2017–2024. doi: 10.4103/0366-6999.239306

Table 3.

Impact of CRUSADE bleeding risk on clinical outcome of ticagrelor versus clopidogrel adjusted by PSM, n (%)

Outcomes Moderate-to-high bleeding risk Low bleeding risk


Ticagrelor (n = 189) Clopidogrel (n = 706) χ2 values P Ticagrelor (n = 590) Clopidogrel (n = 852) χ2 values P
NACE 17 (9.0) 30 (4.2) 6.748 0.009 24 (4.1) 49 (5.8) 2.055 0.152
MACCE 9 (4.8) 21 (3.0) 1.470 0.225 15 (2.5) 42 (4.9) 5.233 0.022
Death 3 (1.6) 8 (1.1) 0.708 4 (0.7) 11 (1.3) 1.273 0.259
MI 1 (0.5) 8 (1.1) 0.693 4 (0.7) 7 (0.8) 1.000
Stroke 1 (0.5) 1 (0.1) 0.378 0 (0.0) 3 (0.4) 0.274
TVR 4 (2.1) 6 (0.8) 0.232 9 (1.5) 23 (2.7) 2.215 0.137
All bleeding 9 (4.8) 9 (1.3) 0.006 9 (1.5) 7 (0.8) 1.574 0.210
BARC2-5 6 (3.2) 5 (0.7) 0.015 2 (0.3) 1 (0.1) 0.571
BARC3-5 4 (2.1) 3 (0.4) 0.040 2 (0.3) 0 (0.0) 0.167

–: Fisher exact test. PSM: Propensity score matching; NACE: Net adverse clinical event; MACCE: Major adverse cardiac or cerebral events; MI: Myocardial infarction; TVR: Target vessel revascularization; BARC: Bleeding Academic Research Consortium.