Skip to main content
. 2018 Aug 22;8(8):e022344. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022344

Table 2.

Quality assessment: Newcastle-Ottawa Scale

Study, year Number of stars
Selection* Comparability† Exposure‡ Overall
Almirall et al,45 1999 4 1 1 6/9
Almirall et al,44 2008 3 1 1 5/9
Baik et al,10 2000 4 2 2 8/9
Breitling et al,39 2016 3 2 2 5/9
Clough et al,42 2003 4 0 1 5/9
Fernández-Solá et al,43 1995 3 2 1 6/9
Inoue et al,36 2007 3 1 1 5/9
Jackson et al,46 2009 4 1 1 6/9
Koivula et al,37 1994 4 1 3 8/9
Lipsky et al,111986 3 0 2 5/9
Loeb et al,48 2009 2 2 1 5/9
Phung and Wang,38 2013 3 0 3 6/9
Quraishi et al,49 2013 1 0 1 2/6
Shen et al,35 2013 3 2 3 8/9
Watt et al,47 2007 4 2 1 7/9
Yende et al,40 2013 4 0 2 6/9
Zaridze et al,41 2009 3 2 1 6/9

*Maximum 4 stars.

†Maximum 2 stars.

‡Maximum 3 stars.