Skip to main content
. 2018 Aug 22;4(2):e000686. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2018-000686

Table 2.

Sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of enthesitis by PDUS for meeting ASAS classification criteria for axial spondyloarthritis, in the DESIR cohort

PDUS performedN=402 PDUS enthesitisN (%) Sensitivity(IC 95%) Specificity(IC 95%) PPV(IC 95%) NPV(IC 95%)
PDUS enthesitis at any site 58(14.4%) 13.9%(9.9 to 17.9) 83.5%(76.5 to 90.4) 69%(57 to 80.9) 26.8%(22.1 to 31.5)
Achille’s PDUS enthesitis 15(3.7%) 4%(1.8 to 6.4) 97%(94.2 to 100) 80%(59.7 to 100) 28%(23.2 to 32.2)
Patellar ligaments PDUS enthesitis 36(9%) 8%(5.1 to 11.5) 89%(83.1 to 94.8) 67%(51.2 to 82.1) 27%(22.2 to 31.4)
Lateral epicondyle PDUS enthesitis 20(5%) 5%(2.4 to 7.3) 94%(90.2 to 98.7) 70%(49.9 to 90.1) 27%(22.8 to 31.8)

The sensitivity and specificity of PDUS-defined enthesitis were calculated on the 402 patients who underwent PDUS, using classification as axial spondyloarthritis according to the ASAS criteria as the reference standard (n=288 patients met these criteria).

ASAS, Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society; DESIR, DEvenir des Spondylarthropathies Indifférenciées Récentes; NPV, negative predictive value; PDUS, power Doppler ultrasonography; PPV, positive predictive value.