Skip to main content
. 2018 Aug 28;13(8):e0202125. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0202125

Table 7. Classification performance results obtained for non-pregnant dummy intervals versus preterm and term, contraction and dummy intervals of the TPEHGT DS.

TPEHGT DS
10-folds Signals S2, S3 (53 non-pregnant / 53 preterm) Signals S2, TOCO (53 non-pregnant / 53 preterm)
Contraction intervals Dummy intervals Contraction intervals Dummy intervals
[%] Se Sp CA AUC Se Sp CA AUC Se Sp CA AUC Se Sp CA AUC
QDA(SFS) (6, 3, 1, 1) 100 98 99.06 99.78 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
10-folds Signals S2, S3 (53 non-pregnant / 53 term) Signals S2, TOCO (53 non-pregnant / 53 term)
Contraction intervals Dummy intervals Contraction intervals Dummy intervals
[%] Se Sp CA AUC Se Sp CA AUC Se Sp CA AUC Se Sp CA AUC
QDA(SFS) (5, 2, 1, 1) 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

The number of features per type of interval are in brackets. The highest CA and AUC per combination of intervals are in bold.