. 2018 Aug 28;13(8):e0203115. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0203115

Table 3. Regression analyses for the two models with the NEO-FFI.

NEO-FFI	Model 1 β	Model 1 SE	Model 2 β	Model 2 SE	KAI β[34]
Neuroticism	.12	.059	.13	.067	-.44^***
Extraversion	-.24^***	.056	-.30^***	.068	.32^*
Openness	-.16^**	.055	-.20^**	.067	.42^***
Agreeableness	.25^***	.054	.30^***	.066	-.62^***
Conscientiousness	.45^***	.056	.50^***	.063	-.50^***
Age	-.03	.030	-.03	.030	.07
Gender–Male	.45^***	.123	.44^***	.123	.16^**
F	19.13^***		19.13^***		18.26^***
(df1,df2)	(7,209)		(7,209)		(10,118)
N	217		217		129
R squared	0.391		0.534		0.67
Multiple correlation	0.625		0.731		0.82

Results show the standardized coefficient (β) and the standard errors (SE). Model 2 is the EIV model [49]. In the last column, we show the results from the EIV model reported in the publication by von Wittich and Antonakis [34]. Their results are based on the KAI.

*p < .05.

**p < .01.

***p < .001.