Table 3.
The OR (95% CI) of EAT affected CIMT and CAC score
| CIMT >0.8 mm
|
CAC score >0
|
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR (95% CI) | P-value | OR (95% CI) | P-value | |
| Model 1 | 1.033 (1.023, 1.044) | <0.0001 | 1.230 (1.204, 1.258) | <0.001 |
| EAT volume (per 10 cm3) | ||||
| Model 2 | 1.006 (0.998, 1.015) | 0.1371 | 1.213 (1.186, 1.242) | <0.001 |
| EAT volume (per 10 cm3) | ||||
| Model 3 | 1.004 (0.996, 1.013) | 0.3083 | 1.214 (1.186, 1.243) | <0.001 |
| EAT volume (per 10 cm3) | ||||
| Model 4 | 1.001 (0.993, 1.009) | 0.8114 | 1.26 (1.225, 1.295) | <0.001 |
| EAT volume (per 10 cm3) | ||||
Notes: Model 1 without any adjustments; model 2 adjusted for age and gender; model 3 adjusted for model 2+ smoking status, hypertension, and diabetes mellitus; model 4 adjusted for model 3+ BMI.
Abbreviations: EAT, epicardial adipose tissue; CIMT, carotid intima-media thickness; CAC, coronary artery calcium.