Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Aug 28.
Published in final edited form as: Chem Soc Rev. 2018 Aug 28;47(17):6486–6504. doi: 10.1039/c8cs00187a

Table 2.

Mechanical data of various regenerated silk morphologies (adapted from ref. 13).

Material formats Stiffness [GPa] Strength [MPa] Extensibility [%] Pore size [μm] (porosity [%])
Films (as cast) 3.9 47.2 1.9 -
Films (methanol-treated) 3.5 58.8 2.1 -
Films (water-annealed) 1.9 67.7 5.5 -
Films (ultrathin, i.e., 20–100 nm; spin coating and spin-assisted layer-by-layer assembly) 6–8 100 0.5–3 -
Hydrogels (8% w/v) - 0.0252 - -
Electrospun mat (concentration of 3%, electric field of 1 kV/cm and 10–15 cm spinning distance) - 15 40 -
Electrospun mat (concentration of 15%, electric field of 2 kV/cm and 5 cm spinning distance) 0.515 7.25 3.2 -
Methanol-treated sponges (concentration 6 wt%) 0.00043 0.02 - 151 ± 40 (88%)
HFIP-derived sponges (concentration 17 w/v%) 0.00045–0.001 0.175–0.25 - 15–202
Aqueous-derived sponges (concentration 4 w/v%) 0.00007 0.011 - 940 ± 50 (95%)
0.00008 0.011 - 760 ± 30 (95%)
0.0001 0.012 - 650 ± 30 (97%)
0.000115 0.013 - 570 ± 30 (97%)
0.00013 0.013 - 470 ± 30 (97%)
Aqueous-derived sponges (concentration 8 w/v%) 0.0013 0.1 - 920 ± 50 (92%)
0.00153 0.125 - 750 ± 20 (94%)
0.00194 0.14 - 640 ± 30 (95%)
Aqueous-derived sponges (concentration 10 w/v%) 0.00333 0.32 - 920 ± 50 (85%)