Skip to main content
. 2018 Aug 27;56(9):e00531-18. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00531-18

TABLE 1.

Performance of FluoroType MTBDR and Genotype MTBDRplus for detection of M. tuberculosis complex from smear-positive and smear-negative sputum specimens compared to culture and Genotype MTBDRplus results obtained from the corresponding cultured isolatesa

Specimen FluoroType MTBDRb
MTBDRplusc
Sensitivity
Specificity
% PPV (95% CI) % NPV (95% CI) No. of invalid tests Sensitivity
% PPV (95% CI) No. of invalid tests
% (95% CI) No. of specimens positive/total no. of samples tested % (95% CI) No. of specimens positive/total no. tested % (95% CI) No. of specimens positive/total no. tested
All (n = 448) 96.11 (93.3–97.8) 322/335 100 (95.6–100) 105/105 100 (98.5–100) 89 (81.6–93.8) 8 97 (94.5–98.8) 334/343 100 (98.6–100) 0
Sputum smear positive (n = 244) 97.9 (94.9–99.2) 232/237 100 (98.4–100) 7 99.2 (96.8–99.9) 242/244 (P = 0.24d) 100 (98.0–100) 0
Sputum smear negative (n = 204) 91.8 (84.1–96.2) 90/98 (P = 0.009e) 100 (96.6–100) 105/105 100 (96–100) 92.9 (86.5–96.9) 1 92.3 (85.5–96.9) 92/99 (P = 0.001,e P = 0.78d) 100 (95–100) 0
a

Definitions of abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; NPV, negative predictive value; PPV, positive predictive value.

b

Fluorotype MTBDR assay done on sputum specimens.

c

Genotype MTBDRplus done on sputum specimens.

d

P values comparing FluoroType MTBDR and Genotype MTBDRplus results within smear groups.

e

Assay-specific P values comparing results for smear-positive and smear-negative specimens.