Skip to main content
. 2018 Aug 24;2(16):2127–2135. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2018019976

Table 5.

Multivariate analysis of graft versus host disease

cGVHD aGVHD grades II-IV
Age (10-y increase) 0.97 (0.85-1.1), P = .6249 0.93 (0.81-1.08), P = .3388
Cytogenetic risk: poor vs intermediate 0.79 (0.59-1.05), P = .1072 0.97 (0.71-1.33), P = .8714
Year of HCT (1-y increase) 0.99 (0.95-1.03), P = .4605 1.04 (0.99-1.09), P = .0902
Female donor to male patient vs other 1.29 (0.96-1.73), P = .0939 1.15 (0.81-1.64), P = .4243
URD 10/10 vs MSD 1.14 (0.82-1.59), P = .4232 1.45 (0.97-2.16), P = .0697
URD 9/10 vs MSD 0.88 (0.53-1.46), P = .6092 1.81 (1.08-3.05), P = .024
CMV patient: positive vs negative 0.96 (0.72-1.29), P = .8033 1.09 (0.78-1.52), P = .6232
CMV donor: positive vs negative 1.08 (0.83-1.4), P = .5887 1.12 (0.82-1.52), P = .4789
Cell source: PB vs BM 1.06 (0.68-1.65), P = .8041 1.21 (0.71-2.05), P = .4805
Disease status at HCT: CR2 vs CR1 0.96 (0.53-1.73), P = .8827 1.06 (0.57-1.96), P = .851
Disease status at HCT: active vs CR1 1.2 (0.92-1.57), P = .1753 1.09 (0.8-1.48), P = .5787
TCD: ATG/alemtuzumab vs none 0.55 (0.4-0.76), P = .0003 0.67 (0.45-0.98), P = .0369
RIC vs MAC (overall effect) 1.49 (1.11-2), P = .0075 0.83 (0.6-1.14), P = .2533