Table 1.

Calculating the typing efficiency and discriminatory power of the markers in the schemes analyzed.

MLST scheme	Molecular marker	Typing efficiency	Mean per scheme [SD]	Discriminatory power [95% CI]	Mean per scheme [SD]	dN/dS
Scheme A	gatA	1.250	0.7928 [0.5305]	0.668 [0.586–0.751]	0.5841 [0.1741]	0.0094
	oppA	1.111		0.624 [0.516–0.732]		0.0191
	hflX	1.250		0.708 [0.634–0.782]		0.0184
	gidA	0.134		0.771 [0.717–0.826]		0.0200
	enoA	1.143		0.639 [0.56–0.718]		0.0184
	hemN	0.026		0.328 [0.191–0.464]		0.5880
	fumC	0.636		0.351 [0.211–0.492]		0.0172
	Combination of loci	0.148		1 [1–1]
Scheme B	glyA	1.400	1.0386 [0.3401]	0.538 [0.372–0.705]	0.5534 [0.1918]	0.0096
	mdhC	1.333		0.289 [0.108–0.469]		0.0058
	pdhA	1.167		0.331 [0.139–0.523]		0.0109
	yhbG	0.381		0.526 [0.342–0.711]		0.0417
	pykF	1.000		0.739 [0.647–0.831]		0.0133
	lysS	0.889		0.668 [0.527–0.809]		0.0156
	leuS	1.100		0.783 [0.671–0.895]		0.0193
	Combination of loci	0.852		1 [1–1]
Scheme C	CT058	0.75	0.3432 [0.2579]	0.875 [0.86–0.89]	0.8774 [0.0404]	0.0904
	CT144	0.277		0.829 [0.811–0.848]		0.2288
	CT172	0.092		0.848 [0.824–0.873]		0.6207
	hctB	0.178		0.925 [0.909–0.941]		0.0785
	pbpB	0.419		0.91 [0.903–0.918]		0.1429
	Combination of loci	0.183		1 [1–1]
Scheme D	CHLAM0895	0.565	0.7344 [0.3559]	0.795 [0.708–0.881]	0.7759 [0.0252]	0.0251
	CHLAM0896	0.611		0.776 [0.675–0.878]		0.0181
	CHLAM0897	0.667		0.87 [0.826–0.913]		0.0133
	CHLAM0898	0.333		0.887 [0.841–0.933]		0.0201
	CHLAM0899	0.522		0.865 [0.819–0.91]		0.0289
	CHLAM0900	1.500		0.303 [0.131–0.476]		0.0075
	CHLAM0901	0.867		0.825 [0.759–0.891]		0.0189
	CHLAM0902	0.81		0.886 [0.837–0.935]		0.0282
	Combination of loci	0.586		1 [1–1]