Skip to main content
. 2015 Sep 10;1(2):CNC8. doi: 10.2217/cnc.15.8

Table 1. . Study characteristics and baseline rapid number naming (King-Devick) scores.

Study ID and reference n Age at Preseason baseline, years (95% CI) K-D test preseason baseline score, seconds (95% CI) Gender Level of play Sport Ref.
1. Galetta KM et al. (2015) 312 13.3 (12.8, 13.8) 54.2 (51.8, 56.6) M/F Youth/college Hockey, lacrosse [29]

2. Galetta KM et al. (2011) 217 20.3 (20.1, 20.5) 38.5 (37.7, 39.3) M/F College Football, basketball [48]

3. Marinides et al.(2014) 220 38.7 (37.8, 39.6) M/F College Football, lacrosse, soccer [30]

4. Galetta MS et al. (2013) 69 24.5 (23.2, 25.8) 42.5 (41.0, 43.9) M Professional Hockey [50]

5. Munce et al. (2014) 15 13.3 (12.9, 13.6) 49.6 (45.7–53.4) M Youth Football [72]

6. Leong et al. (2015) 152 19.6 (19.4, 19.8) 36.3 (35.4, 37.3) M/F College Football, basketball [53]

7. Leong et al. (2014) 34 25.8 (22.9, 28.6) 41.0 (38.1, 43.9) M/F Amateur Boxing [52]

8. Galetta KM et al. (2011) 42 27.2 (24.2, 30.1) 43.3 (41.3, 45.3) M Amateur Boxing [47]

9. Dhawan et al. (2014) 140 15.5 (15.3, 15.7) 44.5 (43.5, 45.4) M Youth Hockey [54]

10. King et al. (2015) 68 24.5 (23.4 25.7) 46.9 (44.8, 48.9) M Amateur Rugby [56]

11. Duenas et al. (2014) 12 16.5 (15.8, 17.2) 43.0 (38.3, 47.6) M Youth Football [55]

12. Munce et al. (2014) 22 12.8 (12.5, 13.0) 52.1 (45.3, 58.9) M Youth Football [73]

13. King et al. (2015) 19 62.0 (57.2, 66.7) M/F Youth Rugby [74]

14. King et al. (2013) 36 23.5 (22.1, 24.8) 49.5 (45.8, 53.2) M Amateur Rugby [49]

15. King et al. (2012) 61 19.3 (18.3, 20.3) 48.4 (46.7, 50.0) M Amateur Rugby [51]

K-D: King-Devick; M: Male; F: Female; n: Number of athletes