Skip to main content
. 2018 Aug 14;9(63):32204–32218. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.25941

Table 4. Prognostic significance of FGF/FGFR gene amplification and FGFR overexpression in primary and oligometastatic CRC.

Lesion Receptor/ ligand Status Events/total Median overall survival in months (95%CI) Log rank test
Primary tumors
FGFR1 Amplified 3/5 38 (3-NA)
non-amplified 33/73 NA (42-NA) P= 0.404
FGF 3,4,19 amplified 2/2 11.5 (10-NA)
non-amplified 41/85 NA (38-NA) P= 0.059
FGFR1 Overexpression 7/10 28 (7-NA)
no overexpression 47/88 53 (38-NA) P= 0.228
FGFR2 Overexpression 3/5 46 (42-NA)
no overexpression 47/85 53 (28-NA) P= 0.99
FGFR3 Overexpression 9/18 46 (27-NA)
no overexpression 48/92 61 (39-NA) P= 0.985
Metastases FGFR1 Amplified 2/2 12.6 (5.24-NA)
non-amplified 15/40 47.4 (40.79-NA) P= 0.00111
FGF 3,4,19 Amplified 0 NA
non-amplified 24/51 41.4 (28.1-NA) NA
FGFR1 Overexpression 1/4 NA (22.2-NA)
no overexpression 21/43 40.8 (28.1-NA) P= 0.428
FGFR2 Overexpression 0 NA
no overexpression 21/45 41.4 (28.1-NA) NA
FGFR3 Overexpression 6/7 19.9 (15.1-NA)
no overexpression 16/40 47.4 (40.8-NA) P= 0.0152

Gene amplification was measured by FISH, overexpression by RNA ISH, based on H-score; CI, confidence interval; NA, not available.