Skip to main content
. 2018 Aug 29;8:12997. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-31202-1

Figure 3.

Figure 3

The WSBM consensus model, fit to a representative matrix averaged across 53 young adult subjects. LH = left hemisphere; RH = right hemisphere. (a) The adjacency matrix ordered by the blocks of the WSBM consensus model. On-diagonal blocks are outlined in red, off-diagonal blocks are outlined in light-red. (b) The adjacency matrix of the young adult data with the on-diagonal blocks colored to match the inflated surface view (in panel c). (c) The community structure of the consensus model visualized on the inflated surface of the left and right hemispheres. (d) The predicted edge-weight and edge-existence matrices; the entries of these matrices contain the consensus model predictions for the average edge-weight and edge-existence for each block interaction. To calculate the consensus model’s average block interaction prediction, these two matrices can be multiplied element-wise. (e) We plot the paired parameters of the block interactions (z-score transformed). From this plot, we observe a general linear relationship between predicted edge-existence and predicted edge weight for each block interaction. We highlight how the WSBM fit densely connected and densely weighted areas (purple dotted circle) as well as non-modular block interactions (red arrow). (f) Visualization of alternative modular community structure, visualized as adjacency matrices and on the cortical surface in the same manner as WSBM model. The labeling of these alternative community structures (represented as colors) are aligned to closely match the labeling of the WSBM model using the Munkres algorithm.