Skip to main content
. 2018 Aug 29;8:12997. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-31202-1

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Evaluation of the laterality of the WSBM and modular community structures. (a) We compute community-based network statistics on the subject network data, yielding node-wise statistics; we then calculate separate distributions of these statistics based on each node’s laterality; we then measure the distance between these two distributions (note the shaded grey distribution illustrates the full, bilateral network statistic distribution) (b) We compare the laterality of each community structure by illustrating the KS between hemispheric distributions of community-based network statistics. We observe that the WSBM partition balances the participation coefficient and node-wise assortativity distributions across hemispheres better than the modular partition. The modular partition preserves within-community z-score better than the WSBM partition.