. 2018 Jun 16;9(32):6659–6669. doi: 10.1039/c8sc00171e

Table 2. Comparison between PARET rate parameters for donor and acceptor cyanine dye J-aggregates strongly coupled to SP (theory) and microcavity (experiment) modes ^a .

	SP (theory) ^b	Microcavity (experiment) ^c
	(2.9–3.2 fs)^–1	(34 fs)^–1
	(177–259 ps)^–1	(603 ps)^–1
	(6.9–12 fs)^–1	(8.5 fs)^–1
	(178–243 ps)^–1	(228 ps)^–1

^aSee Sections S3.3 and S3.4 for additional details.

^bRanges of the rate parameters calculated from eqn (S45), plotted in Fig. S7, and accounting for the facts that typical polariton photoluminescence experiments occur at room temperature and probe only final polariton states near the anticrossings.82

^cRate parameters that were obtained from experimental fitting of a kinetic model and that describe the PARET processes for a blend of J-aggregating NK-2707 (donors) and TDBC (acceptors) cyanine dyes both strongly coupled to a microcavity mode.19

Table 2. Comparison between PARET rate parameters for donor and acceptor cyanine dye J-aggregates strongly coupled to SP (theory) and microcavity (experiment) modes a .

Table 2. Comparison between PARET rate parameters for donor and acceptor cyanine dye J-aggregates strongly coupled to SP (theory) and microcavity (experiment) modes ^a .