Skip to main content
. 2018 Jul 12;9(32):6670–6678. doi: 10.1039/c8sc01829d

Table 1. Selected photochemical/-physical properties of the sensitizers used in this study.

Sensitizer ε 532/(M–1 cm–1) a λ max (em)/nm b τ 0/μs c φ em d α e k oxygen/(M–1 s–1) f k TTET/(M–1 s–1) g
Rubpy 720 625 0.6 0.063 (ref. 31) 3.2 × 109 1.4 × 109
RuPy1 990 630 2.6 0.058 0.79 2.3 × 109 2.3 × 109
RuPy2 770 613 17.9 0.098 0.99 2.4 × 109 2.1 × 109

aMolar absorption coefficients of the sensitizers at the excitation wavelength for upconversion (532 nm).

bMaxima of MLCT emission in H2O.

cUnquenched lifetimes of excited sensitizers as determined by the average of absorption and luminescence decay kinetics.

dLuminescence quantum yields of the MLCT emission using the value of Rubpy as the reference.

eFraction of pyrene-like triplets in the excited-state equilibrium.

fRate constants of oxygen quenching (with 0.27 mM of dissolved oxygen in air-saturated water).20

gRate constants of triplet–triplet energy transfer (TTET) reactions between excited sensitizers and the anthracene derivative MAMA.