Table 3.
Comparison of the performance parameters of MNPs-SPEs sensor and various other methods for OTA detection.
| Methods | Matrix | LOD (ng/mL) |
Recovery (%) | Detection Range (ng/mL) |
Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nanobody-based ELISA | Cereal | 0.16 | 80–105 | 0.27–1.47 | [30] |
| dsDNA-base fluorescence method | Corn | 5 | 89.2–94.1 | 0.00–100 | [33] |
| Portable Flurescence | Cocoa | 1.25 | 79.05–83.25 | 1.25–10 | [34] |
| Silver nanoparticles-based LFIA | Juice and wine | 0.06 | 88.0–110.0 | 0.08–5.0 | [35] |
| Fluorescence polarisation aptamer | Wine | 1.1 | 83–113 | - | [36] |
| Quantum dots-based aptasensor | Foodstuff | 0.5 | - | 1–30 | [37] |
| Fluorescent biosensor | Corn | 2.57 | 96.5–101.4 | 5.0–160 | [38] |
| A Label-Free Aptasensor | Corn | 0.012 | 96–106 | 0.04–0.48 | [39] |
| A Polyaniline film-based aptasensor | - | 0.1 | - | 0.1–10 | [40] |
| Fluorescent aptamer-based sensor | Corn | 0.8 | 83–106 | 1–100 | [41] |
| FRET aptasensor | Peanut | 0.0025 | 90–110 | 0.01–20 | [42] |
| Impedimetric aptasensor | Wine | 0.002 | 102–107 | 0.002–6 | [43] |
| MNPs-SPEs sensor | Cereal and feed | 0.007 | 78.7–113.5 | 0.01–0.82 | This work |
- not mentioned.