Skip to main content
. 2018 Jul 27;9(8):381. doi: 10.3390/genes9080381

Table 1.

Comparisons of gut microbiome of magpie and great spotted cuckoo nestlings and of great spotted cuckoo adults in terms of bacterial richness, α-diversity, composition (weighed and unweighed unifrac β-diversity) and abundance and prevalence of bacterial families.

VARIABLE CONSIDERED TYPE OF SAMPLE COMPARISONS
(A) (B) (C) ANOVA POST-HOC (Tukey tests)
Adult cuckoos Nestling cuckoos Nestling magpies
(N = 6) (N = 12) (N = 7) A vs. B A vs. C B vs. C
Mean Mean Mean F2,22 p p p p
(SE) (SE) (SE) (SE) (SE)
Bacterial Richness 73.8 123 52.29 14.42 0.0001 0.008 0.405 0.0003
−12.1 −8.5 −11.2 −0.19 −0.000008
α-diversity (Shannon index) 3.92 4.45 2.66 6.5 0.006 0.585 0.106 0.005
−0.43 −0.31 −0.4 −0.03 −0.00001
PERMANOVA POST-HOC (Pair-wise t-tests)
Microbiome composition Pseudo-F
(SE)
p (SE) p (t-value) p (t-value) p (t-value)
Weighed unifrac β-diversity 4.35 0.00022 0.559 0.0002 0.0001 (2.63)
−0.01 −0.00004 −0.85 −2.87
Unweighed unifrac β-diversity 5.37 0.0001 0.0002 0.0007 0.0001
−0.07 −0.0001 −1.72 −2.47 −2.61
Abundance of Families
(Bray−Curtis distance matrices)
5.33 0.00013 0.58 0.0008 0.002 (2.94)
−0.03 −0.00002 −0.9 −3
Prevalence of Families
(Jaccard distance matrices)
6.43 0.0001 0.0034 0.0006 0.0001 (2.86)
−0.12 −0.00001 −1.62 −2.55

Bold fonts highlight statistically significant results (p < 0.05).