Skip to main content
. 2018 Aug 20;10(8):1127. doi: 10.3390/nu10081127

Table 4.

Adjusted linear regression of the relationship between the quartiles of dietary pattern score levels and log-transformed RBC aggregation.

Dietary Pattern Scores p-Trend
Quartile 1 Quartile 2 p-Value Quartile 3 p-Value Quartile 4 p-Value
Univariate Ref 0.086 (−0.009–0.181) 0.076 0.086 (−0.016–0.189) 0.097 0.193 (0.084–0.302) 0.001 0.001
Model 1 * Ref 0.083 (−0.011–0.177) 0.081 0.085 (−0.017–0.188) 0.101 0.180 (0.071–0.288) 0.001 0.002
Model 2 # Ref 0.087 (−0.007–0.180) 0.068 0.087 (−0.015–0.188) 0.093 0.208 (0.102–0.314) <0.001 <0.001
Model 3 $ Ref 0.085 (−0.004–0.174) 0.062 0.062 (−0.036–0.161) 0.214 0.190 (0.074–0.306) 0.002 0.010
Model 4 ^ Ref 0.065 (−0.028–0.158) 0.167 0.068 (−0.032–0.168) 0.178 0.155 (0.049–0.261) 0.005 0.004
Model 5 & Ref 0.069 (−0.021–0.159) 0.131 0.049 (−0.049–0.146) 0.322 0.158 (0.045–0.270) 0.007 0.024

* Model 1. adjusted for age; # Model 2: adjusted for age and sex; $ Model 3: adjusted for age, sex, and log BMI; ^ Model 4: adjusted for age, sex, and hyperlipidemia; & Model 5: adjusted for age, sex, log BMI, and hyperlipidemia. RBC: red blood cell.