Table 3.
Logistic regression between variants of LEPR and excess weight. Salvador, Bahia, Brazil, 2005–2006.
| SNVs | Risk Allele | MAF | OR | 95% CI | p * | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| rs1137100 | G | 0.17 | 1.36 | 0.95 | 1.95 | 0.096 |
| rs1137101 | G | 0.48 | 0.94 | 0.64 | 1.38 | 0.757 |
| rs115650230 | G | 0.02 | 2.19 | 1.08 | 4.45 | 0.018 |
| rs116239759 | G | 0.02 | 2.25 | 1.11 | 4.58 | 0.014 |
| rs1177681 | G | 0.20 | 1.42 | 1.00 | 2.00 | 0.050 |
| rs202069668 | C | 0.28 | 1.51 | 1.07 | 2.13 | 0.019 |
| rs78005150 | G | 0.04 | 0.41 | 0.17 | 0.95 | 0.039 |
| rs79353784 | A | 0.01 | 2.84 | 1.19 | 6.75 | 0.016 |
| rs8179183 | C | 0.21 | 1.06 | 0.74 | 1.52 | 0.752 |
OR—Dominant model adjusted by gender, age, energy, PC1, PC2, PC3. * p: 50,000 permutations, adjusted for energy, gender, age, PC1, PC2, P3.