Skip to main content
. 2018 Jul 26;10(8):969. doi: 10.3390/nu10080969

Table 6.

Zn retention, transport, and cellular uptake in enriched emulsions.

Experimental Treatments
C (M ± SD) CHXT (M ± SD) CHXTOl (M ± SD) SZ (M ± SD) SZHXT (M ± SD) SZHXTOl (M ± SD)
Zn concentration in the soluble fraction added (mg/mL) 0.14 ± 0.01 e 0.16 ± 0.01 de 0.18 ± 0.01 cd 0.21 ± 0.01 bc 0.22 ± 0.006 b 0.49 ± 0.01 a
Mineral added monolayer (μg) 3.79 ± 0.02 e 4.49 ± 0.11 c 6.04 ± 0.27 b 4.07 ± 0.1 d 4.63 ± 0.06 c 4.95 ± 0.07 a
Mineral retained in apical chamber (μg) 1.7 ± 0.02 c 2.23 ± 0.1 bc 2.73 ± 0.26 ab 1.8 ± 0.11 c 2.4 ± 0.06 cd 1.15 ± 0.08 ab
Retention % 44.85 ± 0.18 d 49.66 ± 0.01 b 45.19 ± 0.16 c 44.23 ± 0.2 d 51.83 ± 0.61 a 23.23 ± 0.58 c
Mineral transported to basolateral chamber (μg) 0.94 ± 0.0001 c 1.29 ± 0.12 bc 2.23 ± 0.18 a 1.23 ± 0.13 bc 1.4 ± 0.12 b 1.54 ± 0.03 a
Transport % 24.8 ± 0.07 e 28.73 ± 0.01 d 36.92 ± 0.01 a 30.22 ± 0.009 c 30.23 ± 0.009 c 31.11 ± 0.2 b
Mineral uptake by cells (μg) 1.15 ± 0.1 ab 0.97 ± 0.06 bc 1.08 ± 0.06 ab 1.04 ± 0.005 abc 0.83 ± 0.0 c 2.26 ± 0.1 a
Uptake % 30.34 ± 4.17 a 21.6 ± 1.32 c 17.88 ± 3.9 d 25.55 ± 1.26 b 17.92 ± 0.94 d 45.65 ± 2.13 c
TE 11.12 ± 0.03 e 14.26 ± 0.02 c 16.68 ± 0.21 a 13.36 ± 0.3 d 15.66 ± 0.12 b 7.22 ± 0.18 cd
UE 13.6 ± 1.87 a 10.72 ± 3.27 c 8.07 ± 6.51 e 11.3 ± 2.35 b 9.28 ± 1.01 d 10.6 ± 1.13 c

M ± SD: Mean ± standard deviation; TE: Transport efficiency; UE: Uptake efficiency; HXT: Hydroxytyrosol (23% extract from vegetation waste water). EVOO: Extra Virgin Olive Oil; C: Control; CHXT: 50 ppm HTX; CHXTOl: 50 ppm HXT + 10% EVOO; SZ: Control fortified with Zn and Se meat; SZHXT: SZ + 50 ppm HXT; SZHXTOl: SZ + 50 ppm HXT + 10% EVOO. Different letters in the same row indicate significant differences between samples (p < 0.05).