Skip to main content
. 2001 Nov 20;98(24):14027–14032. doi: 10.1073/pnas.201530198

Table 1.

Circadian period estimates

Subject Age, years Gender τOBSm, hr ± SD (95% CI), hr τm, hr ± SD τt, hr ± SD
T cycle = 24.0 h
 18G6 20 M 23.97  ± 0.03 (23.92–24.02) 23.88  ± 0.01 23.88  ± 0.04
 1814 24 M 23.96  ± 0.02 (23.91–24.01) 23.92  ± 0.01 23.91  ± 0.05
 1842 38 M 23.98  ± 0.04 (23.89–24.06)
 1983 38 F 24.02  ± 0.05 (23.92–24.12) 24.06  ± 0.03 24.08  ± 0.07
 19A4 24 M 24.06  ± 0.04 (23.98–24.14) 24.12  ± 0.02 24.14  ± 0.04
 18G1 31 M 24.27  ± 0.03 (24.21–24.32) 24.36  ± 0.01 24.48  ± 0.05
T cycle = 23.5 h*
 2029 28 M 23.89  ± 0.09 (22.79–24.99)
 19F8 44 M 24.14  ± 0.02 (24.05–24.22)
 2028 26 M 24.19  ± 0.03 (23.76–24.62)
T cycle = 24.6 h
 1916 37 M 23.87  ± 0.03 (23.82–23.92) 23.77  ± 0.01 23.77  ± 0.04
 18J5 31 M 24.02  ± 0.03 (23.96–24.07) 23.93  ± 0.01 23.95  ± 0.07
 1715 27 M 24.35  ± 0.01 (24.33–24.37)
 1922 33 M 24.34  ± 0.03 (24.28–24.39) 24.16  ± 0.01 24.07  ± 0.05
 19A9 40 F 24.34  ± 0.03 (24.29–24.39) 24.20  ± 0.03 24.16  ± 0.08
 1947 41 F 24.40  ± 0.03 (24.35–24.45) 24.23  ± 0.01 24.22  ± 0.09
Range 20–44 23.77–24.36 23.77–24.48

Observed plasma melatonin rhythm (τOBSm) during imposed 24.0-, 23.5-, and 24.6-h days and 95% confidence intervals; intrinsic circadian period as estimated by melatonin (τm) and core body temperature (τt) rhythms during forced desynchrony (T = 28 h). For each subject, the periods of the (τm) versus the (τt) rhythms during forced desynchrony were strongly correlated (Pearson correlation: r = 0.97; P < 0.0001). Period estimates were not available in five subjects because the forced desynchrony protocol was not conducted. 

*

Because of the few data points collected, observed periods estimates and 95% CI for T = 23.5 h were derived from linear fits of melatonin onsets during CRs and day 14 (Fig. 1a).